I changed my Instagram algorithm. My ‘For You’ page showcased the divine feminine, religion without an institution, and spiritual dissatisfaction. I found myself curious on how younger religious people were navigating the world. However, I did not expect to seek out new definitions for faith and belonging.
As a concept, I was wary of the “divine feminine.” I grew up in a church environment where women were referenced in Biblical text, but the patriarchal-God reigned supreme. I did not belong to a sexist place of worship, far as I can recall. My younger self interpreted religion as a template to living.

I remember the sheer awe of one Black woman who incorporated her pan-African spiritual beliefs with the African Methodist Episcopalian tradition. Our Bibles illustrated a Black Jesus with a shiny bed of jet black curls.
When I visited this lady’s house, I admired the calming nature of incense and earth-tone colors displayed from room to room. Was this part of the divine? What did my girl-child-self think then? The intentional creation of imagery and scent. To be a woman, I would create sacred space.
As an adult, I feel a little uneasy reframing my spiritual practices. How would I keep the tenets of my mostly-patriarchal faith group? I find it hard to center the divine feminine at all. Perhaps, I had been biased in my interpretations of goddess worship. However, I don’t see myself going that direction. I watched the women closest to me – in their monotheistic traditions – pivot. The curiosity grew. I started to read more contemporary and older literature discussing women’s spirituality.

I am aware of at least two approaches to the divine feminine.
One, the divine may include admiration for women figures in the Judaic, Christian, and Islamic traditions. It may focus on motherhood or not. It may focus on autonomy outside of societal biases. The echoes of Sunday School flood my ears on who to emulate.
I would imagine that non-monotheistic traditions have an earlier history with the ‘ divine feminine.’ I circle the rows of a metaphysical store, as my tarot-enthusiast friend shops. The sapphic shaped candles. The pentagrams. The history is out-of-my-depth.
Two, the divinity term may focus more on goddess worship and efforts to use non-male-centered symbols. Some women may blend varying traditions together, Eastern and Western practices. I envision the older Black women from my childhood. Their source-power derives from African spiritualities. I imagine that some folks may already have existing masculine and feminine god-like interpretations.
Surprisingly, I did not expect them in the one-God spaces.
While reading Catholic mystics such as St. Teresa of Avila and Julian of Norwich, I discovered another way to view God. A former professor, who served as a nun for many years, introduced our spirituality class to the works of St. Teresa of Avila.
I draw inspiration for her heightened notoriety. Previously, I had zero knowledge of women saints and/or anchoresses. My sour taste of sainthood began with the writings of St. Thomas Aquinas. In a feminist theory course, my class felt displeased with Aquinas’ feeble-interpretations of women. It mirrored my disdain for earlier philosophers, Plato and Aristotle. It brought forth how certain Christian communities quoted Paul (when referencing women’s involvement in the church). But I doubt any woman wants to be silenced. Spiritually gagged, if you will.
However, Teresa’s work as translated by Mirabai Starr has been a window of sorts. The fervor of St. Teresa of Avila’s Interior Castle reminds me of cleansing. I should examine the metaphorical rooms within myself, while minding what needs attention in my physical life. Perhaps, I am drawn to the themes of acceptance of self.
Mirabai Starr has also translated the works of Julian of Norwich, an anchoress. The Showings: Uncovering the Face of the Feminine in Revelations of Divine Love has been a curious read. While I am not Catholic, I am intrigued by this introduction by Mirabai Starr about Julian of Norwich. The inclusion of God as mother may prove interesting to the divine feminine crowd. Starr writes, “…the ever-present source of all Goodness, who transcends gender and permeates all things (xxi, Starr).”
I weigh these words carefully. I do appreciate the fluidity they hold, especially in our visible world of gender identity. Is this part of the “deconstruction” work? By taking apart antiquated definitions; perhaps, people will build a more welcoming divinity. Who do we include in the divine?

With that said, bookstores house a multitude of books written about Mary Magdalene. She’s been noted as the wife of Jesus, a repentant prostitute, and/or the powerhouse of women’s spirituality. To some scholars, Mary Magdalene has been conflated with negative imagery (as in the same vein as Eve can be). I am armed with more questions than when I started reading. Scholars such as Elaine Pagels and James Carroll have a great deal of perspective on how religion changes.
In the Secrets of Mary Magdalene: A Guide to Her Story, History, and Heresy, additional scholars debate and reason with earlier and contemporary canon. I found it interesting to read about their segments about the Gnostic Gospels, a selection of Biblical text not included in the complete body of work. More so, the “controlling images” about women that influence culture and generational attitudes.
Who should women admire? What are the pitfalls to avoid? How does one honor oneself? What gifts and/or elements of the divine are innately within us? What power do women hold?
Cakes for the Queen of Heaven: An Exploration of Women’s Power, Past, Present and Future offers insight to the twentieth century woman. While it’s 2023, I am curious about what conversations took place before.
Author, Shirley Ann Ranck, details her experiences with unlearning self-sabotage. Her main objectives within each chapter focus on realized power. She quotes Jean Baker Miller, and then continues to explain her own interpretation. “Our male-dominated society has tended to define power as power over others, the ability to control…Real confidence in oneself and real power for oneself have the opposite effect — they reduce the need to have power over others or to control them (Ranck, pp.51-52).”
Ranck furthers her objective by stating that women must not fear their own power, but harness it. However, I do find it interesting how women’s spirituality from each generation more or less has been about audacity. How do women amplify and/or reframe their roles as individuals and as a-part-of-the-whole?
The divine feminine must be tailored to the individual, I argue. It appears as though discovering its full impact will be a process. I want to feel that I have the power to craft my spirituality.
…
Bibliography:
Burstein, Dan, and Arne De Keijzer. Secrets of Mary Magdalene: A Guide to Her Story, History, and Heresy. Edited by Deirdre Good and Jennifer Doll, Orion Books Ltd., 2007.
Ranck, Shirley Ann. “Reclaiming Our Power as Women.” Cakes for the Queen of Heaven: An Exploration of Women’s Power Past, Present and Future, Delphi Press, Chicago, IL, 1995, pp. 51–52.
Starr, Mirabai. Julian of Norwich The Showings: Uncovering the Face of the Feminine in Revelations of Divine Love. HAMPTON ROADS PUB CO INC, 2022.
















